What is true about a nonconforming use in relation to zoning changes?

A nonconforming use refers to a property that was lawful before a zoning change but does not comply with the new zoning regulations. The correct answer indicates that such a property can continue to operate despite changes in zoning. This principle is essential for providing a degree of stability to property owners when regulations shift, allowing them to maintain their business or residential use without immediate disruption or financial loss.

Nonconforming use typically helps avoid potential legal and economic hardships for property owners by allowing them to maintain their established use even if it no longer aligns with current zoning laws. In many jurisdictions, this type of use is grandfathered in, meaning that while the use can continue, any expansion or significant alteration may be restricted.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the nature of nonconforming uses in relation to zoning changes. Immediate closure is not generally required unless there is a significant public safety concern. Furthermore, while property values might be affected over time due to changes in zoning or neighborhood dynamics, it is not an automatic consequence. Lastly, complying with new zoning regulations is not a requirement for nonconforming uses, as they were established under previous regulations that were lawful at the time.